| Team | Previous | Current | Change | The Rikker says: | Record | Point differential | Schedule strength based on '09 records |
| *Naw'leans | 1 | 1 | 0 | Team to beat. Have beaten 2 good teams without their O going full bore. | 2-0 | 8 | 27 |
| *The Pack | 3 | 2 | 1 | Ready to compete for Bowl | 2-0 | 34 | 22 |
| *Texas | 4 | 3 | 1 | Comeback to build off of | 2-0 | 13 | 2 |
| *Pitt | 6 | 4 | 2 | Two gritty wins with no QB…impressive | 2-0 | 14 | 23 |
| *Indy | 8 | 5 | 3 | Back on track? No Sanders? | 1-1 | 14 | 11 |
| *Belicheats | 2 | 7 | -5 | Still class of East | 1-1 | 0 | 6 |
| *Fish | 12 | 7 | 5 | Dangerously flying under radar | 2-0 | 9 | 18 |
| *DABears | 18 | 8 | 10 | Nice win, and 2-0 is 2-0 | 2-0 | 12 | 14 |
| The ATL | 11 | 9 | 2 | Homers | 1-1 | 28 | 21 |
| Balty | 5 | 10 | -5 | Tough team, BUT can Flacco take next step | 1-1 | -4 | 13 |
| J-E-T-S | 10 | 11 | -1 | Put it all together this week | 1-1 | 13 | 19 |
| Beagles | 13 | 12 | 1 | I hate to admit it, but Vick looks way too good to sit | 1-1 | -4 | 9 |
| *Bolts | 19 | 13 | 6 | Will win division - so who cares | 1-1 | 18 | 29 |
| *Snideskins | 20 | 14 | 6 | Toughy to overcome? | 1-1 | 3 | 8 |
| Cincy | 22 | 15 | 7 | Why add TO? | 1-1 | -9 | 4 |
| *Gints | 7 | 16 | -9 | They don't get it | 1-1 | -11 | 7 |
| *Vikes | 9 | 17 | -8 | Favre needs a receiver, and a new ankle | 0-2 | -9 | 15 |
| *Niners | 24 | 18 | 6 | About as un-alarming of an 0-2 as you can be in that weak division. Looked good anyway. | 0-2 | -28 | 28 |
| Jaguars | 17 | 19 | -2 | Competitive | 1-1 | -18 | 5 |
| Tits | 16 | 20 | -4 | You beat the Radas - big whoop | 1-1 | 17 | 1 |
| Cowboys | 14 | 21 | -7 | Team not built for guts and W's | 0-2 | -13 | 3 |
| Chiefs | 21 | 22 | -1 | Improving | 1-1 | 9 | 17 |
| Bucs | 26 | 23 | 3 | Young and a shocking 2-0, albeit against 2 bad teams | 2-0 | 16 | 25 |
| DEEE-troit | 25 | 24 | 1 | Improved, but still unlucky. | 0-2 | -8 | 12 |
| Orange Crush | 27 | 25 | 2 | Homers | 1-1 | 10 | 24 |
| Seabirds | 23 | 26 | -3 | Carroll is a silly college twirp | 1-1 | 8 | 30 |
| Zona | 15 | 27 | -12 | With no Warner, mediocre at best | 1-1 | -30 | 32 |
| Radas | 30 | 28 | 2 | WOW, you beat the Rams…I guess everything is fine | 1-1 | -23 | 20 |
| Pcats | 28 | 29 | -1 | Steaming pile I | 0-2 | -26 | 26 |
| Lambs | 31 | 30 | 1 | Could be 2-0 aginst easy foes….not good, but rebuilding at least | 0-2 | -6 | 31 |
| Toronto | 29 | 31 | -2 | Fitzpatrick IS better than Backwards, but he still aint good and they aren't committed to rebuilding either. | 0-2 | -32 | 16 |
| Cleveburgh | 32 | 32 | 0 | Steaming pile II | 0-2 | -5 | 10 |
| *Playoff picks |
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Week 2 - NFL Power Rankings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment